Contradictions and rationality in the context of the doctrine of the Incarnation

In this paper, I respond to what have called an epistemological objection a dialetheist approach the doctrine of Incarnation, which one example is Beall’s contradictory Christ. discuss Anderson’s book Paradox in Christian theology, author claims account for rationality Incarnation as merely apparently doctrine, and present my model, based on according has possibility be rational by understanding it genuinely contradictory. show that model fits perfectly well with criteria that, Anderson, any paradoxical should meet. Beall does not address problem his works about Christ, he asserts interested it. However, think if wants make theory more robust, less suspicious, convincing theologians, philosophers, ordinary people, consider problem.